🔗 Share this article

While the existentially challenged Tories convenes in Manchester for its yearly gathering, it has much to ponder regarding its next steps. It’s not even clear if a viable path remains open. These are tough times for a governing group that now has little, if anything, new or unique to say to the public.

What Could Have Been

Things could have turned out so different if tangible progress had been made on an policy focus that resonates with people throughout the UK: Levelling up. However the previous administration did not possess the first clue on how to turn his zeitgeisty rhetoric on levelling up into actual implementation. During the initial period after the 2019 election, it discussed what the term truly represented.

It seemed strange to me, because I’d already told the Prime Minister what social mobility entailed when we initially discussed about it during his leadership campaign. The expression was a term I developed and used at the DfE to talk about social mobility. This became our guiding principle, and its definition is straightforward: levelling up is the means by which we attain equal access – not through reducing chances away from those who are already advantaged, but rather by providing opportunities to those that are without.

Essential Principle

An additional vital DfE phrase we used, “ability is distributed uniformly across our country, yet chances are not”, represented another a deliberate expression, embodying the two parts of a equal opportunity plan. To begin with, potential shared equally but not nurtured uniformly through our learning institutions. Furthermore, chances not distributed fairly by businesses or our economic system. Therefore, learning and employment were crucial to achieving better life chances. This constituted an priority about the societal structure of our country – supporting human talent and connecting them to opportunities.

What Levelling Up Became

How did the social mobility agenda turn into under the previous government? A towns fund managed by the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities. Hanging baskets and rearranged intersections. An official policy document was published a significant period after the leadership change, which saw existing policy approaches repackaged under the recently branded agenda.

Therefore, a wider fairness strategy went unpursued, as well as all the improvement that it could have inspired – in capital, commerce, fiscal strategy, tax and in place-making. And, of course, in schooling, including a university system that has become a target for politicians of all stripes – although it remains the strongest driver of life improvement for young working-class people, including myself, this country has had throughout modern times. Possibly the primary source of equal opportunity, functioning widely.

Why Hope Matters

Hope is vital for our country to prosper. For hope to exist, there needs to be a credible sense that dedication and outcome are related; that if people dream big, they can attain. For political leadership, being able to create a sense of optimism about the tomorrow is critical. Research by the academic institution at Bath University and others, recently released, showed that the ministry’s focus zones I established during my tenure – community-focused methods to improving education outcomes – led to students in those neighborhoods being up to nearly one-fifth more hopeful about their life ahead than those in comparable communities without these initiatives in place. The data shows: just making an genuine beginning on pro-social mobility policy can swiftly and beneficially change how people view their future.

Lost Potential

Ignoring this evidence, and in the midst of its post-Johnson leadership contest, in autumn 2022, the Conservative government ended the initiatives. Why should any person in those regions vote for a party that took that action? This specific initiative is a clear case of what could have been a game-changing Tory policy platform on levelling up, but that chance was totally misused. Approaches such as this can inspire hope and aspiration. On the other hand, as the ruling party discovered, reneging on commitments of fair chances is the biggest blunder any leadership can make. The public penalized the government for its incompetence but, above all, for its broken promises on equal opportunity.

Today’s Political Reality

Currently the mandate on equal opportunity and equality of opportunity has been taken up by a opposition party. The previous terminology has been abandoned. The new government has its own policy language of “eliminating hurdles to advancement”. The party that is steadily supplanting the hapless Conservative party, the alternative party, also has its own language – “industrial revival”. The terminology to talk about fresh prospects in areas like the one I come from, in South Yorkshire. It claims that an former economic strength can be reborn into an modern manufacturing sector.

To the electorate, it must feel like a déjà vu experience. Same issue, new terminology. Yet, currently, little improvement.

The Way Forward

Should the current and alternative parties want to escape the identical outcome, each group should understand the Conservatives’ failure on social mobility; that equal opportunity talk is simple terminology, but effective implementation of more equal results is much harder. Britain’s endemically weak social mobility remains the key issue for our country, with youth unable to get a good job beginning, those putting in effort in employment with minimal progress after the housing costs are covered, and citizens throughout the UK without any genuine belief their next generation will be able to do any better in life than they have.

Elected officials can discuss fairer opportunities repeatedly. But where is the political group that has the complete plan on equal opportunity? I observe no such party. The first to achieve this, wins. Not only for their organization, but, crucially, for a whole country that has desperately requires fair chances so desperately.